Go Back   Cruiser Log World Cruising & Sailing Forums > Cruising Forums > Living Aboard
Cruiser Wiki Click Here to Login

Join Cruiser Log Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-25-2010, 02:45 PM   #1
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 58
Post

WINMOR Long distance radio email on Winlink 2000 WITHOUT Pactor



WINMOR 1600 Hz connection.

Yesterday Dorval, PY2LIN, on his sailboat Luthier 60 NM south of Salvador on the Brazil east coast, sent two emails via the Winlink 2000 RMS, VE1YZ-5, near Halifax in Nova Scotia, using only his laptop and HF SSB radio. That is correct, NO Pactor TNC or modem was used.

This was done using $39 worth of Windows based software, called Winmor, and his laptop's internal sound card. The distance between the two stations was more than 3600 NM on an amateur radio frequency of 18.102 KHz.

Dorval's ham radio setup on Luthier consists of a Kenwood TS-480 radio and a 23 ft whip antenna on the back of the boat. The laptop was an ASUS netbook with internal sound card. (But any similar setup will work sufficiently). It is recommended that the Signalink external sound card be used for greater speed. (Beta testers of Winmor have seen throughput speeds of between Pactor 2 and 3).

More and more of these Winmor-enabled Winlink 2000 RMS's (gateways) are coming on line. Click on the following link to see an updated list, and then click on "Mode" to sort the Winmor channels on top. The frequencies are center frequency, and 1.5 KHz needs to be subtracted to get to the USB radio dial frequency.

http://www.winlink.org/RMSHFStatus

More information from Beta testers in the field can be seen here:

http://www.sarl.org.za/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=4452

To learn more about Winmor and to download its present email client called RMS Express, click here:

http://www.winlink.org/WINMOR
__________________

__________________
Hamsailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2010, 09:31 PM   #2
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 58
Default

Hi All,

Here is Youtube video of WINMOR on RMS Express in action.

This was before the software was very robust, and I used the video to record a crash.

This was done between two laptops with acoustic coupling (microphones and speakers), and the internal sound cards. No radios and no RF.

Note the CPU usage. About 20 % on a 1.5 GHz laptop.

Also note I had to trip the "Busy Channel Indicator" at the beginning. (Due to noise into the microphones.)

Note the automatic "gear shift" to 8Car V16PSK.

Note the CPU spike at the crash.

WINMOR does NOT crash anymore, and is very stable, fast and robust now.

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sg5lG-x8wbw&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparant"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sg5lG-x8wbw&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparant" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
__________________

__________________
Hamsailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 03:23 AM   #3
Moderator
 
delatbabel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 700
Send a message via AIM to delatbabel
Default

This is all very interesting and good news. I have an ICOM IC-M600 and although it's got the blanking plate in the back where the PACTOR modem interface should go, there is no modem interface and I'm finding it hard to obtain the parts to build one. Also the cost of the PACTOR modems is quite high, and there's no guarantee it would work on the HF set I have.

How would I go about physically interfacing my laptop to this radio? At the back of the radio there's an jack for an external speaker (6.5mm mono although I have a 3.5mm plug converter in there). There's a single 3 pin microphone jack, into which the ICOM microphone is plugged. Would I unplug the mic from the HF radio and run it to the audio output of my sound card, then run the audio input of my sound card to the external speaker jack? Or would I use a purely audio connection a la acoustic coupler modems of many years ago? Or do I need to purchase some additional hardware to connect?

One concern is that the ICOM mic has a press-to-talk button on it, obviously I don't want to have to push that button each time the Winmor software wants to transmit.

Any clues anyone?
__________________
= New South Wales, Queensland,
delatbabel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 04:13 AM   #4
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 58
Default

Hi delatbabel,

Ok, first try the Signalink external sound card and interface. They have interface cables for each and every radio possible at your local ham radio shop.

Second, acoustic coupling will work and some guys have had great success. PTT is done via the radio's VOX (all controls set to minimum).

Third, try this link. See the home built interface: http://www.emergencyradio.ca/course/Gettin...d%20Digital.pdf

There are two WINMOR RMS's (gateways) in Australia already. Many more to come, I am sure.

I don't know all the answers, but ask away.

Best regards,

Bernard

Hamsailor

ZS4BDK
__________________
Hamsailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 04:26 AM   #5
Commander
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 151
Default

It seems like good news. I cannot understand how a closed protocol could go so long like the pactor in the ham world.

Where is the protocol description?
__________________
magwas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 04:57 AM   #6
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 58
Default

Hi maqwas,

Most of the documents are here: http://www.winlink.org/WINMOR

Some other ones and the software (RMS Express), is on the Yahoo Winmor Group reflector, here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WINMOR

Sign in to Yahoo, or create a free account.

Note: We are still in Beta testing, but almost done.
__________________
Hamsailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2010, 05:27 PM   #7
Ensign
 
Auspicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by magwas View Post
It seems like good news. I cannot understand how a closed protocol could go so long like the pactor in the ham world.

Where is the protocol description?
My understanding is that Pactor II and III are not "closed" in the sense of secret, but they are patented by the inventors. Accordingly they retain all the rights to production, distribution, and sale. That is the reward for invention and creativity!

Pactor II and III have retained their market share in the ham, marine, and "outback" worlds because there hasn't been a viable alternative. WINMOR still won't beat Pactor III for speed and robustness, but it is looking quite promising. It is still in beta test and the authors are still tweaking the algorithms.

sail fast and eat well, dave KO4MI

S/V Auspicious WDC9882
__________________
sail fast, dave

S/V Auspicious
Auspicious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2010, 07:39 PM   #8
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 58
Default

To help with the download and installation of WINMOR RMS Express, also read this very excellent Winmor Primer by Dr Fred Hambrecht, W4JLE here:

(Takes a little while to download.)

http://www.winlink.org/webfm_send/109
__________________
Hamsailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 02:02 AM   #9
Admiral
 
MMNETSEA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamsailor View Post
The distance between the two stations was more than 3600 NM on an amateur radio frequency of 18.102 KHz.
NB. 18.102 KHz should read 18.102 MHz or 18102 KHz.

Question:- is the software for 'Winmor' free ?
__________________
MMNETSEA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 02:34 PM   #10
Lieutenant
 
idpnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMNETSEA View Post
NB. 18.102 KHz should read 18.102 MHz or 18102 KHz.

Question:- is the software for 'Winmor' free ?
It was supposed to be, I read somewhere it will be 30 USD now. Fortunately the spec is open so there should be a free software version before too long..
__________________
sv Libertalia
idpnd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 03:29 AM   #11
Moderator
 
delatbabel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 700
Send a message via AIM to delatbabel
Default

Free as in "speech" vs Free as in "beer".

The WINMOR protocol is free as in "speech" because anyone can take a copy of it, read it, and provided that they understand it and implement it correctly, get it running with their own software/hardware. It is not subject to onerous copyright or patent conditions. I could write a version for Linux, Macintosh, or even my mobile phone if it had a decent sound driver. If I had the time, patience, and technology I could design and build my own customised hardware implementation of the WINMOR protocol in an external modem. I could not do that with PACTOR because it has copyright and patent restrictions.

The current WINMOR software is not free as in "beer" because you have to pay money to obtain it. Once you have it, you can do as you will with it.

Note that most free software is free "speech" not free "beer" because (for example) although you can download and install a copy of Ubuntu yourself, if you decide to take it into your local Linux store they will install and configure it for you however they will ask you for a fee to cover their time and equipment.
__________________
= New South Wales, Queensland,
delatbabel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 10:33 AM   #12
Admiral
 
MMNETSEA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,067
Default

The definition of a protocol in computing terms is given as :-

A protocol is a set of rules which is used by computers to communicate with each other across a network. A protocol is a convention or standard that controls or enables the connection, communication, and data transfer between computing endpoints. In its simplest form, a protocol can be defined as the rules governing the syntax, semantics, and synchronization of communication. Protocols may be implemented by hardware, software, or a combination of the two. At the lowest level, a protocol defines the behavior of a hardware connection.

The question as to whether the programme was free arose because we had been informed that it was still in the Beta stage of development and yet it required payment of between $30 and $39 to acquire it. One hopes that the use of Cruiser log is not regarded by the developers of Winmor as a means of advertising a product that they are developing for commercial gain.
__________________
MMNETSEA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 11:01 PM   #13
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 58
Default

Interesting the way this thread is turning out....

I posted this to draw attention to Winmor to HELP cruisers on a fixed income. Those who specifically want inexpensive email from the High Seas.

And I have absolutely no affiliation with the Winmor designers.

I am only an avid ham radio operator and sailor who knows a great deal when I see one.

Are you kidding me ? $39 against $1200 ?

As a Beta tester of Winmor from the gitgo, I can tell you that it works fantastically well in real conditions for the price. This should excite all sailing cruisers on a budget.

Advertising it ? - Heck no. Just absolutely loving this protocol and software.

A working sound card virtual TNC for Winlink 2000 email, has been long overdue.
__________________
Hamsailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 10:31 AM   #14
Admiral
 
MMNETSEA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,067
Default

Thanks Bernard, for your explanation regarding your involvement as a beta tester of this product (Note: We are still in Beta testing, but almost done)

It would be appreciated that once the product has become a fully commercial venture beyond the Beta testing stage, that the developers thereof will consider sponsoring one of our appropriate forums.
__________________
MMNETSEA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2010, 09:35 PM   #15
Lieutenant
 
idpnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 43
Default

I think this has been misunderstood, even the initial developers will probably gain very little in commercial terms (and certainly not hamsailor). It's still a world of difference to the prior 1200 USD hardware requirement as hamsailor rightly points out. If someone were to get on the gear forum recommending a 50 USD servo windvane you wouldn't accuse them of trying to sell it would you now

The protocol is free as in freedom, but the first implementation thereof (currently in beta) is closed source and won't be cross-platform, as its programmed in some absurd Microsoft based environment. I have no problem with them trying to recuperate their development costs, I just feel it's not in tune with the ham spirit and I won't be able to use it on my linux, that's my complaint..
__________________
sv Libertalia
idpnd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 02:44 AM   #16
Moderator
 
delatbabel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 700
Send a message via AIM to delatbabel
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idpnd View Post
The protocol is free as in freedom, but the first implementation thereof (currently in beta) is closed source and won't be cross-platform, as its programmed in some absurd Microsoft based environment. I have no problem with them trying to recuperate their development costs, I just feel it's not in tune with the ham spirit and I won't be able to use it on my linux, that's my complaint..
The fact that there is a closed source implementation isn't greatly relevant. The important thing is that the protocol is free and open, and unencumbered by patents. Others are at liberty to develop their own open or closed source implementations at will, and over time there will almost certainly be a Linux version.

TCP/IP is also an open protocol and there are many closed source and for-cost implementations, but there are always open source versions available too.

I think that this entire open protocol thing for digital communication over HF is a great leap forwards compared to the PACTOR situation and it deserves as much air time as possible. I have already forwarded the initial announcement on to my various Linux and electronics friends groups.
__________________
= New South Wales, Queensland,
delatbabel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 04:08 AM   #17
Moderator
 
redbopeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Home Port: Washington DC
Vessel Name: SV Mahdee
Posts: 3,236
Default

I'm thrilled to see this solution and competition for the Pactor product which is far too expensive for many cruisers.
__________________
"Do or do not. There is no try." - Yoda

What we're doing - The sailing life aboard and the Schooner Chandlery.

redbopeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 03:57 PM   #18
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 58
Default

Hi All,

The WINMOR RMS Express software is now available for download

on the Winlink 2000 website as well.

Look for RMS Express Full install 0.4.2.0.zip

Also download A Winmor Primer.pdf (Takes a little time to download)

Also read the RMS Express "Help" file.

See more WINMOR information here:

http://www.winlink.org/WINMOR
__________________
Hamsailor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2010, 03:19 AM   #19
Ensign
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamsailor View Post
The WINMOR RMS Express software is now available for download

on the Winlink 2000 website as well.
I downloaded this only to find the file protected with a password!?!? I thought WINMOR is supposed to be an open and free alternative to PACTOR?

PSKMAIL - http://pskmail.wikispaces.com/ - is truly open source and free... And cross platform to boot. No passwords, nothing shrouded in secrecy...

Am I misunderstanding something about WINMOR?
__________________
scotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2010, 05:49 AM   #20
Retired Mod
 
Lighthouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Home Port: Durban
Posts: 2,984
Default

It must be extremely annoying to go through the effort of downloading something only to find that it is password protected.
__________________

__________________


The World Cruising & Sailing Wiki

Help to build this free, online World Cruising Guide.

"Built by cruisers, for cruisers''

I've Contributed to the Cruisers Wiki: Most sections
Lighthouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
World Wide Call For Winlink 2000 Winmor Sysops. Hamsailor Power & Electronics 1 06-30-2010 07:57 AM
Turn Your Yacht Into A Mobile Winmor Enabled Winlink 2000 Gateway Hamsailor General Cruising Forum 4 01-26-2010 06:00 PM
Winmor (virtual Tnc) Software For Winlink 2000 In Beta Testing. Hamsailor Power & Electronics 3 10-13-2009 08:38 AM
Winlink 2000 Hf Ssb E-mail System From Home On The Internet. Hamsailor General Cruising Forum 4 01-07-2008 07:53 PM
Insurance for long distance cruising steelfan General Cruising Forum 8 07-17-2005 12:29 PM

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

RV & Travel Trailer Communities

Our RV & Travel Trailer sites encompasses virtually all types of Recreational Vehicles, from brand-specific to general RV communities.

» More about our RV Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
×