World Cruising and Sailing Forums: Maxpower Marine Fuel Cell - World Cruising and Sailing Forums

Jump to content


Search all the Forums and the Cruising Wiki

Visit our sponsor.

Posted Image
  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Maxpower Marine Fuel Cell A real step forward? Rate Topic: ****- 1 Votes

#1 User is offline   Drifter 

  • Lieutenant
  • Icon
  • Group: Full Member
  • Posts: 61
  • Joined: 16-February 07

Posted 20 May 2007 - 09:09 PM

Maxpower Marine Fuel Cell.

Anyone using this?

This marine fuel cell looks like a real step forward for the DC needs of a cruising yacht. Seems like an initial Euro 5,000 outlay and the cartidges will be available worldwide. Tell me more someone!

http://www.max-power...cell/index.html

:unsure:
0

#2 User is online   Lighthouse 

  • Board Captain
  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 4,967
  • Joined: 07-March 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat:Shorebound.
  • Name:High and Dry
  • Location:South Africa.

Posted 20 May 2007 - 09:36 PM

A description of Marine Fuel Cells HERE.
0

#3 User is offline   MMNETSEA 

  • Admiral
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3,386
  • Joined: 06-October 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat:Multihull
  • Location:South East Asia

Posted 21 May 2007 - 03:34 AM

A very good article appears Power & Motor Yacht - Jan 2004 :-

http://www.powerandm...ests/0104duffy/

Elsewhere, a common issue raised was the problem of the heat generated by the process - In tropical climates in sailing yachts this would be a problem that does not appear to have been solved - maybe it has: any new information on that subject would be very welcome
0

#4 User is offline   Drifter 

  • Lieutenant
  • Icon
  • Group: Full Member
  • Posts: 61
  • Joined: 16-February 07

Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:25 AM

If you add an electric power plant (link) to the equation we ARE perhaps looking to the future. It would be interesting to work out the cost of having to replace a yacht's engine compared to installing an electric unit and a fuel cell?
0

#5 User is online   Lighthouse 

  • Board Captain
  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 4,967
  • Joined: 07-March 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat:Shorebound.
  • Name:High and Dry
  • Location:South Africa.

Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:35 AM

Throw this one in as well:
http://peswiki.com/i...irectory:EEStor

Looks like a diesel engine's days are numbered.

:icon_loll:
0

#6 User is offline   Peter Owen 

  • Commander
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • Group: Full Member
  • Posts: 131
  • Joined: 16-August 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Kirby, CH48 4DN, United Kingdom

Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:57 AM

I think that we've been around here before. Previous threads have noted that Lagoon is already deploying electric drive supplemented, I guess, by sailing motion, diesel, wind, solar generation. We've also discussed the viability of using electricity as an option for cooking.

The world does move on, of course, and the guy in Australasia who has been sailing around with a tent of solar panels covering his yacht may well find his dream of an "electric boat" fulfilled by others using more effective technologies including fuel cells, electric motors, heat exchangers, insulators, battery storage

I wonder if there's anyone else actually addressing the whole thing from a professional perspective - Lagoon might not be a bad place to start!

This post has been edited by Lighthouse: 21 May 2007 - 06:02 PM
Reason for edit: Added link to another thread.

0

#7 User is offline   seastalkercat 

  • Ensign
  • Pip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 20-May 07
  • Location:Cape Cod MA USA

Posted 21 May 2007 - 11:42 AM

View PostMMNETSEA, on May 20 2007, 09:40 PM, said:

A very good article appears Power & Motor Yacht - Jan 2004 :-

http://www.powerandm...ests/0104duffy/

Elsewhere, a common issue raised was the problem of the heat generated by the process - In tropical climates in sailing yachts this would be a problem that does not appear to have been solved - maybe it has: any new information on that subject would be very welcome

The "unwanted" heat could be used either thermoelectrically or evaporatively to cool the vessel,drive refrigeration and even power an icemaker.
0

#8 User is offline   MMNETSEA 

  • Admiral
  • Icon
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3,386
  • Joined: 06-October 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat:Multihull
  • Location:South East Asia

Posted 21 May 2007 - 01:35 PM

View Postseastalkercat, on May , 04:48 PM, said:

The "unwanted" heat could be used either thermoelectrically or evaporatively to cool the vessel,drive refrigeration and even power an icemaker.


What system that exists today could provide that solution, at the same as bringing down the temperature in the saloon - would there be enough heat to provide refridgeration ?
0

#9 User is offline   Watsons 

  • Ensign
  • Pip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 22-April 07

Posted 21 May 2007 - 05:42 PM

The FAQ's on this device say that the fuel cell needs its inards replacing every 1500 - 5000 hrs of use. This doesn't sound very long!!
0

#10 User is offline   Harbor_Pilot 

  • (Out of Office for now)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Hon Member
  • Posts: 643
  • Joined: 03-February 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado, USA

Posted 21 May 2007 - 08:58 PM

View PostWatsons, on May 21 2007, 09:48 AM, said:

The FAQ's on this device say that the fuel cell needs its inards replacing every 1500 - 5000 hrs of use. This doesn't sound very long!!


Watsons,

Welcome to the board! :welcome_icon:

You make a good point, a thought provoking question, something to consider in the overall cost of power and energy sources.

As a DC power pack may be in some degree of service every hour of every day here is a perspective:

365 days in a long year X 24 hours per day = 8760 hours per year
1500 hour useable life / 8760 hrs = minimum .17 years of use - time to replace (about 2 months)

(1500 + 5000) = 6500 / 2 = 3250 hrs average life
3250 / 8760 = average .37 years of use - time to replace (about 4.5 months)

5000 / 8760 = maximum .57 years of use - time to replace (about 6.9 months)

Or consider using the fuel cell at maximum capacity only 8 hours a day:
8 x 365 = 2920 hours
2920 / 8760 = .33 years of use - time to replace (about 4 months)

NOTE: I am not certain if my math fully applies to the technology, as currently I do not understand what consumes or wears out the innards, and why the large variation of 1500 - 5000 hours; or why one fuel cell could last 3.33 times longer than another in a differant application.

In making a comparison of the best method of how to provide power and the related expense, each cruiser must also consider how often they need to replace the innards of their fuel tanks.

I am interested in this technology, and will study it much more. I suspect it will be refined in time, as often technology is.

Jeff
0

#11 User is online   Lighthouse 

  • Board Captain
  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 4,967
  • Joined: 07-March 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat:Shorebound.
  • Name:High and Dry
  • Location:South Africa.

Posted 21 May 2007 - 09:23 PM

Quote

innards of their fuel tanks

A replacement cartridge.

The way I understand it is that the "charge" automatically switches off if batteries are "full" - also switches off if an alternator is delivering a charge.

It appears then that if you also have a couple of solar panels the "cartridges" will last a loooooooong time.

More homework needs to be done.
0

#12 User is offline   Trim50 

  • Away cruising (retired mod)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Hon Member
  • Posts: 1,194
  • Joined: 25-February 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat:Del Rey 50
  • Name:Trim
  • Location:Long Beach, CA

Posted 21 May 2007 - 11:33 PM

Well guys, I just happen to be the VP of Engineering for a company called UltraCell. We make micro fuel cells for the military at this time, but we will eventually find our way into the consumer markets once MEA technologies improve and balance of plant components are cheaper to produce.

For all practical purposes, there are only two companies making MEAs which are at the heart and sole of the fuel cell. Dupont produces an MEA using Nafion while BASF just got into the game by buying PEMEAS who makes our MEAs based on a PBI/Phosphoric acid technology originally used on the Apollo fuel cells.

From these two types of MEAs, there are a large assortment of fuel cell technologies being developed which differ by the means of delivering hydrogen to the MEA. Our technology relies on reformed methanol to produce hydrogen on demand, while many others use compressed hydrogen gas.

The two greatest challenges for the fuel cell technology at this time are MEA life and durability, and safe/cost effective production and delivery of hydrogen to the cell stack. Knowing the true nature of these challenges, I can assure you that the diesel engine is safe for at least another decade.

My personal dream and technical goal is to produce a fuel cell that can reform heavy fuel like diesel within a system that can also extract hydrogen from sea water. Such a system would ultimately give the sailor true autonomy from land.

If you have any questions regarding Fuel Cell technology, I’ll gladly provide whatever answers I can.

FYI, Maxpower Marine Fuel Cell is produced by the German company Smart Fuel Cells. Smart is our #1 Competition in micro fuel cells. They are partly owned by Dupont and we are partly owned by BASF.
0

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic