Pilot House, How Seaworthy......
#1
Posted 14 June 2007 - 06:14 PM
Her thoughts were it would have been nice to take in the out doors without being subject to the elements. He assured her again they were not seaworthy enough for the journey.
She said that every where they went, there were pilot house vessels making te same trip.
So as I entertain myself by scanning the boat ads what do you think?
Seaworthy or not Seaworthy?
Other aspects of pilot house boats that should be considered? Seems like watch would be little more comfortable as well.
Duckwheat
#2
Posted 14 June 2007 - 09:22 PM
The one thing that you need to be careful of is the strength of the glass. On the advice of Steve Dashew, we went with 3/4" storm glass when replacing our windows. I got just a little nervous when I saw a picture of a pilothouse that had suffered a knockdown in the Atlantic, breaking the front starboard windshield and allowing the Atlantic swift access inboard. I believe that boat sank. With our bulletproof windows, my husband has suggested we can stand behind them in case of a pirate attack--he said they're stronger than the surrounding fiberglass! Of course, I'd prefer never to test this theory. I can't imagine sticking out my tongue at anyone with a gun. Glass that's 3/4" may be on the obsessive side, but I'd rather be that way than not about safety issues--and water packs a punch when it's angry.
Normandie
This post has been edited by SeaVenture: 14 June 2007 - 09:24 PM
#3
Posted 14 June 2007 - 10:06 PM
We've seen a number of pilothouse boats that looked eminently seaworthy, and many have gone a long way. One couple we met in the S. Pacific (they left from Florida several years earlier) loved their pilothouse, saying what you comment on - it was most comfortable on watches no matter the weather.
Then again, we've been on at least one pilothouse model (a Cheoy Lee) that made me a bit queasy while still at the dock. Too top heavy, needed a sail to be up to keep the movement comfortable.
I think, I would say I believe, that there are seaworthy boats and those that are not seaworthy in the pilothouse configuration. The size of the windows, and what they are made of, is one consideration. There is a BABA/Panda owner's web site that you might want to visit. Check out other boat makes' owner's sites, and that might give you more insight into how far/how well the boat you might be interested in has traveled. Take it with a grain of salt sometimes. We had a friend who circumnavigated on a San Juan 30, a light, round-the-buoys club racer - not what one would consider a blue-water boat - but it got him home. Even Hunters have circumnavigated.
#4
Posted 14 June 2007 - 10:12 PM
If I was asked to choose the most seaworthy type of vessel I know of then I would plumb for a flush-decked Colin Archer with no more than a small, one-man cockpit.
Aye,
Stephen
Yacht NAUSIKAA
#5
Posted 15 June 2007 - 01:40 AM
If you've ever seen one of the Dashew (spelling?) videos on their boats, you'll see pilothouses there. I'm always a bit surprised, though because they seem to have open aft ends with just a canvas/plastic covering like a dodger. They point to plexiglass sliding doors that shut off the cabin below from the pilothouse, but it seems a little iffy. I'm thinking, with their reputation for wanting things very safe, that I'm missing something and those plexi doors must be much stronger than I'd thought.
Good sailing!
#6
Posted 15 June 2007 - 04:17 AM
I may be wrong, but I understood the Fisher range of pilothouse yacht/motorsailers was designed specifically for use in the North Sea, where I believe they have developed a strong following and a reputation for toughness.
There seems to be a trend in the US at the moment toward beamy, pilothouse yachts designed specifically for inshore weekend sailing, or marina life. These boats will be ideal for fulfilling their design function, but should not be confused with pilothouse boats built for blue water.
David
#7
Posted 15 June 2007 - 02:15 PM
Auzzee, on Jun 14 2007, 10:23 PM, said:
I forgot about the Fishers. We've been on at least one of them, and they seem a sturdy boat. Nice looking, too.
#8
Posted 16 June 2007 - 03:17 AM
Full-time liveaboard for ten years.
25,000 miles across the Pacific, Indian & Atlantic Oceans.
Cyclone Justin in the Coral Sea, Super Typhoon Paka in the Philippine Sea and Square Wave Bashing up the Red Sea.
At one point during Justin - we were literally looking at fish swimming in blue water outside the big pilothouse windows. Scared the crap out of me but we made it and gave me faith in the design.
Sold her for a lot more than we paid for her.
I do miss the view and inside helm.
Happy Hunting,
Kirk
#9
Posted 17 June 2007 - 08:32 AM
Aye
Stephen
Yacht NAUSIKAA
#10
Posted 18 June 2007 - 04:24 PM
And there is a difference between the more traditional pilot house yachts with big windows (eg the old wooden Nauti Cats I would not take over the North Sea in October) and the later models of the same ship yard and, for example, the Northshore produced Vancouver 34 Pilot and 38 Pilot... wonderful examples of safe pilot house yachts I' like to have if I had the money...
And , Stephen, concerning the Fishers: I am not so sure about their deep cockpits and the sliding doors... Yes, they are well known and quite common in our northern European waters but we have never seen them doing long term cruising.
So, if pilot house yachts are built sturdy, they have alot advandages, I believe...
Uwe
SY Aquaria ( a yacht with a very low cabin trunk, with just a spray hood giving some shelter for the man on the sheets and none to the man at the helm...)
#11
Posted 18 June 2007 - 06:31 PM
Deep cockpits are always worrying and I have never been happy with sliding doors either but they are not uncommon on commercial craft. In high latitudes a pilot houise has a lot going for it but again, I wouild never choose one for seawothiness. having said that, North Sea fishing boats, which were of similar form, have survived many a storm.
Aye
Stephen
#12
Posted 19 June 2007 - 10:39 PM

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote

