Originally Posted by magwas
I am sure they are saying the same. And they have the same level of truth you have: none.
If you say that summary punishment is acceptable ("war cannot be fought without casualties"), then you should also accept summary blame on their part (the long history of exploitation by white men).
Exploitation by white men, EXCUSE ME ... Take a look at the whole of Africa all 54 countries, Zimbabwe is a disaster, and the country is run by Bobby Mugabe, Look at Idi Amin, who massacred somewhere near 500,000 people, (according to Wikipedia), just to name 2, and if South Africa is ever run by Julius Malema
the leader of the ANC youth organization there would be more rape murder and massacre and that country would be oppressed as well Oh, Kenya, Nigeria, Somalia, all oppressed, not by the "White Man". There are but a handful or less than that of countries whose populous are not oppressed. It is not about the "White Man" as you put it, but about oppression.
I have no level of truth, how do you figure and how dare you say that, do you know me personally, and know that I am a liar ... I fought for my country, so that you can sleep at night, I was wounded in battle, I have seen my friends die next to me fighting for a lost cause and at the ripe old old age 54 I am still prepared to fight and die if necessary for my country. Why, fighting oppression, some may not think so, but friends died in Zambia and Zimbabwe and are those countries oppressed (I think so)
My son-in-law is in Afghanistan fighting for your freedom and opression. He is doing his 2nd tour, after being shot in Iraq. I am so angry right now that I can't even think straight.
When you have walked in my shoes and you know me personally, don't tell me that I do not speak truths as you put it.
Attached is a photo of my son-in-laws helmet, which shows his and my my families level of commitment to fighting oppression.
A proud American